Pump Life Expectancy: Myths, Math, and Meaningful Metrics

SHARE

The preface to one of my books (Pump User’s Handbook) alluded to the area of pump-failure statistics. Such statistics are often translated into MTBF (mean time between failure). And to not become enmeshed in arguments, in the early 2000s, when the first edition (one of four) of that book was published, many best-practice plants followed a bare-bones approach to determine MTBF: They simply took all their installed pumps, divided this number by the number of repair incidents, and multiplied it by the time period being observed.

Based on the above formula, for a well-managed and reasonably reliability-focused U.S. refinery with 1,200 installed pumps and 156 repair incidents in one year, the MTBF would be calculated as (1,200/156) =7.7 years.

As a repair incident, the refinery would count the replacement of parts—any parts—regardless of cost. In this case, a drain plug worth $1.70 or an impeller costing $5,000 would show up the same way on the MTBF statistics. Only the replacement of lube oil would not be counted as a repair.

A well-managed refinery calculates MTBF at 7.7 years—but are these numbers telling the full story?

The best-practice plant’s total repair cost for pumps would include all direct labor, materials, indirect labor and overhead, administration costs, labor to procure parts, and even the prorated cost of pump-related fire incidents. There are references to the stated average cost of pump repairs: $10,287 in 1984 and $ 11,000 in 2005.

This indicates, in relative terms, a repair cost reduction, because a 2005 dollar bought considerably less than the 1984 dollar. Thus, it can be reasoned that predictive maintenance and similar monitoring have led to a trend toward reduced failure severity.

The mean-times-between-failures in Table I were estimated using the same bare-bones measurement strategy and from published data and observations made while performing maintenance-effectiveness studies and reliability audits in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

Pump Mean-Times-Between-Failures.

Table I. Pump Mean-Times-Between-Failures.

Analyzing Pump Reliability Data Across Multiple Plants

In early 2005, Gordon Buck, the John Crane Company’s Chief Engineer for Field Operations in Baton Rouge, LA, examined the repair records for several refinery and chemical plants to obtain meaningful reliability data for centrifugal pumps.

A total of 15 operating plants with nearly 15,000 pumps were included in Buck’s survey. The smallest facilities had about 100 pumps; several sites had over 2,000. The suggested seal targets shown in Table II came out of that research.

All of the surveyed plants were located in the United States. Furthermore, all of them had some pump-reliability program in progress. Some of these programs could be considered as “new,” some as “renewed,” and still others as “established.”

Many of these operations, but not all, had an alliance contract with John Crane. In some cases, the alliance contract included having a John Crane technician or engineer on-site to coordinate various aspects of the program.

Suggested refinery seal target MTBFs.

Table II. Suggested refinery seal target MTBFs.

However, not all of the surveyed plants were refineries and different results could have been expected elsewhere. In chemical plants, for example, many small pumps have traditionally been “throw-away” items, given that chemical attack leads to the limited life of these designs.

While things have improved in recent years, the limited space available in DIN and ASME stuffing boxes limits the type of seal that can be fitted to more compact and simple versions. Lifetimes in chemical installations are generally believed to be around 50% to 60% of the refinery values.

Setting Realistic Targets for Pump and Component Lifespan

Based upon the lifetime levels achieved in practice in 2000 and combined with the known “best practice” as outlined in available reference texts, Table III’s target pump and component lifetimes are currently recommended. Moreover, they should be considered readily achievable today.

Realistic target pump and component lifetimes. (Note that

Table III. Realistic target pump and component lifetimes. (Note that “target” is less than “best actually achieved.”)

It should again be emphasized that many plants are achieving these levels. Nevertheless, to reach these types of pump lives, the components must operate at the highest levels. For example, an unsuitable seal with a one-month or less lifetime will have a catastrophic effect on pump MTBF, as would a poorly performing coupling or bearing.

You May Also Like