What is the difference between doing the right job and doing the job right? There is a big difference. I recently posted a picture on LinkedIn of a job completed at my house. The post garnered more than 18,000 views, so it hit a nerve with many folks.
I needed a gas meter replaced on the exterior of my house. Two young technicians came out to do the work. They arrived early in the morning and looked at what they needed to replace the old meter. They told me they had to go to the store to pick up materials and would be right back.
Six hours later, they returned. They changed out the meter and then knocked on the door to let me know they were done before going on their way. The job took about two hours to complete. Two days later, I went out to check out the work. This is what I found:
This work is entirely unacceptable. The job is not complete until the work is done correctly and the job site is cleaned up. I called the HVAC company to complain, but nothing came of it.
Is this an example of getting the right job done or doing the job right? The right job was to replace the meter. Doing the job right was installing the meter correctly and picking up the leftover materials and packaging.
Over the last couple of years, I needed to repair a windshield crack. A technician came out to do the work, and not only did he repair the damage. He then proceeded to vacuum my truck entirely.
Fast forward to last month. A new crack occurred when a semi kicked up a rock that damaged my windshield. I called the same company to come out and repair the damaged windshield.
The technician came out and repaired the crack, but he left with no notification that he had completed the work. There was no vacuuming, but he did leave a few materials on the driveway. Doing the right job or doing the job right?
Ensuring Maintenance Quality Through Oversight and Accountability
By now, most managers and many front-line technicians in institutional and commercial facilities are familiar with the practice of continuous improvement. One key element of such improvement is understanding where improvement is needed to ensure maintenance improves.
Technicians must take personal pride in their work each day, and supervisors occasionally should audit the work technicians complete. Maintenance planners support the process by reviewing work orders for completeness, actual time spent on the job, materials, and tools accounted for, and feedback from the technician doing the work.
Consider this: 63 percent of maintenance activity is self-inflicted, meaning maintenance caused more maintenance.
Technicians always find the time to do a job again, but they rarely seem to have enough time to do it right the first time.
When I worked in Western Texas, I enjoyed working closely with a maintenance manager named Bill. I attended a morning shift meeting where Bill handed out job assignments.
When he handed one of the technicians a work order to repair a pump that had failed overnight, the technician told Bill he had been to the job site the day before to repair the same pump. Without hesitation, Bill said, “Yesterday, you worked on it. Today, I want you to fix it.” Instead of calling them work orders, maybe we should call them fix orders.
Maintenance departments waste about 33 percent of a typical budget on poor maintenance practices.
There are numerous reasons for this.
In some cases, managers do not develop detailed job plans and instead let technicians wing it. If a correct part is unavailable, technicians use duct tape and bailing wire to perform temporary repairs that turn into permanent fixes.
They might have done a great job of troubleshooting, but they did a lousy job determining root causes. They did not take enough time to fix it right the first time.
In other cases, a department’s technicians do not have the appropriate skills and competency. These are just a few of the reasons I have seen that departments waste too much time and money on maintenance.
Strategies for Achieving Lasting, High-Quality Maintenance Outcomes
How can managers make sure technicians do the job right?
Audits. Randomly select work to audit. Look to see if the job was done safely and correctly and if the job site was cleaner when they started.
Ask the customer. After the work is completed, ask the requestor or area in which the work was completed for feedback. Several organizations I work with have the requestor or department supervisor sign off on the work order, confirming that they accept the equipment or the completed work.
Implement 5S standards. I am a strong advocate for implementing 5S strategies in the workplace. These strategies include:
- Get rid of the junk.
- Set in order. Organize.
- Emphasize cleanliness and housekeeping.
- Define the acceptable standard.
- Educate, train, and audit.
I have never heard a maintenance manager say, “Sure, go ahead and throw that junk out.” It’s quite the opposite. Most managers choose to keep leftover job materials because technicians might be able to repair them or take parts from them.
Defining a standard for clean and organized is simple. Take the example of a former colleague with two young daughters. He would ask the girls to clean their room before going out to play.
It’s funny that what is acceptable to 12-year-old girls or boys is not as clean as their parents. My colleague held a Kaizen event one afternoon in their bedroom. Once done, Mike took pictures and posted them on the bedroom door. It might have been a bit overdone, but it established a standard for the appearance of a clean room.
Finally, managers must sustain all the hard work they achieved with the other steps. The way to sustain the gains is to audit technicians’ work and change the organization’s culture. Take critical steps to ensure technicians take pride in the work they do.
There is a big difference between doing the right job and doing the job right. No one wants to clean up after someone else. No one wants to do rework. No one wants to continually struggle with the same failures over and over. Technicians must take pride in their work to the point where it becomes a badge of honor.
Andrew Gager, CEO of AMG International Consulting, Inc., is an industry-leading expert in manufacturing best practices, maintenance systems, and supply chain optimization, with over 20 years of Operations Leadership experience spanning from shop floor operations to plant management. The last 20+ years working with M&R organizations across industries such as manufacturing, oil & gas, food & beverage, pharma, and transportation, specializing in OpEx, reliability-based solutions and materials management. A Certified Maintenance Reliability Professional (CMRP), Certified in Planning & Inventory Management (CPIM) and Six Sigma Green Belt (CSSGB), Andrew is a sought-after speaker and trainer, known for his dynamic presentation style. He is regularly published in multiple trade periodicals. He holds a BS in Business & Operations Management from Rochester Institute of Technology.
